HIPAA/HCFA  

On February 13, 2003, HHS Secretary Tommy Thompson announced the adoption of the HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996) Security Final Rule. The final standards were published in the February 20, 2003, Federal Register with an effective date of April 21, 2003. Most covered entities will have two full years -- until April 21, 2005 -- to comply with the standards  

 


HIPAA will mandate new requirements in three key areas: 

  • Standardization of electronic patient health, administrative and financial data
  • Unique health identifiers for individuals, employers, health plans and health care providers
  • Security standards protecting the confidentiality and integrity of "individually identifiable health information," past, present or future

By October 2002, health systems will have to be in compliance with the Transactions Rules. A recent amendment does 
allow for a health system to file for a one-year extension based on having a concrete HIPAA action plan in place. By April 
14, 2003, compliance is required on the Privacy Rule. In less than two years, thousands of health systems and physician 
practices will have to be HIPAA-compliant. Some are saying that the preparation, expense and deployment time will be 
greater than Y2K. 

 

Until recently, patient record and other security issues have prevented widespread use of the Internet in health care 
applications. But new guidelines published by the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) establish the first 
set of definitive security standards covering sensitive health care information. HIPAA  builds on. HCFA's ground 
breaking work with proposed security standards that will bring the full benefits and cost-saving advantages of 
Internet technology to the health care industry.

HCFA’s Internet Security Policy

The HCFA guidelines are more explicit than those cited in HIPAA security proposals. HCFA's policy 
outlines specific requirements in three areas: encryption, authentication and identification.:

Encryption specifications permit three alternatives or their equivalents:

  • Triple DES (defined as 112-bit equivalent) for symmetric encryption,
  • 1024-bit algorithms for asymmetric encryption, or
  • 160-bit elliptical curve forms of encryption.

Authentication, which must occur at the beginning of each session, is permitted using one of four methods:

  • locally-managed digital certificates, providing all parties are covered,
  • use of third-party certificate authorities,
  • self-authentication as an internal control of private keys, or
  • tokens or smart cards.

Identification of users, which may involve exchange of passwords, is a one-time task that occurs when users 
establish the internet account.

HCFA states that technologies that allow users to prove they are who they say they are [proof of identity] 
(authentication or identification) and the organized scrambling of data [privacy of information] (encryption) to 
avoid inappropriate disclosure or modification must be used to insure that data travels safely over the Internet 
and is only disclosed to authorized parties. HCFA specifications conform to the three P’s of VPN security:

  • Protection of Resources
  • Proof of Identity
  • Privacy of Information

"It is permissible to use the Internet for transmission of HCFA Privacy Act-protected and/or other sensitive 
HCFA information, as long as an acceptable method of encryption is utilized to provide for confidentiality 
and integrity of this data, and that authentication or identification procedures are employed to assure that 
both the sender and recipient of the data are known to each other and are authorized to receive and 
decrypt such information." -- HCFA Internet Security Policy




Changes to the business associate (i.e. a transcription company) requirements are designed to ease some of the 
administrative and financial burdens associated with re-negotiating existing agreements. The modifications add a 
new transition period to the Privacy Rule that effectively extends the deadline for complying with the business 
associate contract requirements. Under the modified rule, certain existing vendor contracts would be deemed to 
comply with the requirements for business associate contracts for up to one additional year beyond the Privacy 
Rule's April 14, 2003 compliance date (the "Compliance Date"). Under the modified rule, covered entities may take 
advantage of the transition period with respect to those of its vendor contracts which:

(a) are in existence prior to the effective date of the modified rule, and
(b) do not expire or are not modified or amended prior to the Compliance Date.

The proposed Security Rule required a "chain of trust partner agreement" between parties exchanging data electronically. 
In keeping with the goal of aligning Privacy and Security requirements, Section 164.314 of the final Security Rule requires 
a Business Associate agreement, which is already required by the Privacy Rule. Forrelationships where a third party is 
used to create, receive, maintain or transmit EPHI (Electronic Protected Health Information) on the covered entity's behalf, 
the Security Rule requires the business associate to:

  • Implement administrative, physical and technical safeguards that reasonably and appropriately protect the confidentiality, integrity and availability of the covered entity's EPHI;
  • Ensure that its agents and subcontractors to whom it provides EPHI meet the same standard;
  • Report to the covered entity any security incident of which it becomes aware; and
  • Ensure that the contract authorizes termination if the business associate has violated a material term.

The Security Rule adopts the Privacy Rule's exceptions to the agreement requirement for disclosures to providers for 
treatment, exchanges of information between government entities, and exchanges between group health plans and 
their sponsors. However, it does not adopt the Privacy Rule's exception for covered entities participating in an organized 
health care arrangement (OHCA). This section also applies the Security Rule provisions to affiliated entities, hybrid 
entities and group health plans, again increasing the new Rule's compatibility with Privacy Rule provisions for these entities.  

 

 

For more information on HIPAA compliance, go to: http://www.hipaacomply.com/

For more information on HIPAA, please go to  http://www.cms.hhs.gov/hipaa/ , The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid

Services: